The first definition that she gave as a background was
particularly appealing to me, in a sense that I had never really thought about
it. She is quoting Benedict Anderson who defines "a nation is an imagined
political community" An "imagined" political community? I feel
like if more people heard this definition, they would be more open to having a
broader appreciation outside their own political realm. If the public of many
nations realized this "imaginary" sense, I feel as though they would
think they had opportunity to more greatly affect the community.
Here notion of the inside vs outside is one of prominence in
this conflict, and it goes hand in hand with the idea of the "other"
and the definition of homeland. Social Constructions have forced humans into a
continuous competitive mindset, always wanting to be part of something better,
and always having an enemy to beat. The idea that every group needs to have a
counter part is pretty disappointing, when in reality, we are all the other. This need for competition is what pushes us to find what is ours, what belongs to us, a home. When in a search for this home while "the other" is doing the same, it can only lead to conflict. That is why I think that is we were to re-establish what is a homeland, so that can incompass not just those that are similar to you culturally, but bound to all for hope that they too find a homeland.
No comments:
Post a Comment